Quote:
ORIGINAL: SKiLLeD
I thought the pre-explosions of the towers falling pretty convincing...
It really does look like an explosion happens before the collapsing tower reaches the section where the explosion takes place.
|
The Pentagon case was more than enough for me to raise an eyebrow. The hole this 'Jet Airliner' hitting the side of the building was smaller than just one of its engines was. And the parts found of the plane (though few in numbers) did not match those of the spec's for the jet itself. Sure, people heard and saw a jet. But, think about it...a Jet Airliner traveling about 50 feet up at 500Mph would pretty much flatten anything and everything below it. A cruise Missile would not, it is much smaller (though still big)...also note...Tomahawks use Jet engines.
The witnesses are telling thier story yes, but what they really saw was a 500mph blur, a huge jet sound, and an explosion. They put the peices together using the info that the Twin towers were hit by Jet's, they simply assumed it was another Jet. After all, in thier minds, why would a cruise missile be fired at the Pentagon?
If the Gov'mt wanted to prove otherwise, they would simply release the Tapes the FBI took that caught the crash happening, instead of just 5 frames of video (of which a Jet Airliner was not in any of them)
My thoughts on the subject..